Please activate cookies in order to turn autoplay off

Government wants to 'improve' SCR opt-out

Health minister Simon Burns has said a review of England's electronic health records (EHRs) must lead to patients and doctors feeling 'ownership'

Burns said Scotland's experience of EHRs, with a system for use in emergencies covering almost the entire population, shows that they are worth introducing in England.

"However, effective use of the SCR depends on patients and doctors feeling an ownership of the records," the minister added in a parliamentary written answer on 26 July 2010.

"We believe the current processes that are in place need to be reviewed to ensure that both the information that patients receive, and the process by which they opt-out, are as clear and simple as possible. In addition, should patients choose to opt-out they must be able to do so as early in the process as is feasible," he said.

"We intend to review the content of the record and consider whether we can improve the process whereby patients can opt-out."

Burns confirmed that strategic health authorities have been told not to send out more information letters concerning SCRs until the review has been completed.

The statement came as Dr Paul Cundy, a GP and former chair of the British Medical Association's GP IT committee, recommended that his peers add a code to all patient records stopping them from being turned into SCRs, unless patients have clearly said they want to take part.

"For any patient who's not explicitly told them that they want to have a SCR, GPs should enter a 93C3 Read code into their notes," he said. "This will stop any uploads to the SCR and will enable the system to run on an explicit opt-in basis, which is what everyone has been demanding."

Dr Cundy said he will be adding the codes to his patients' records by the end of the month, without informing them that he is doing this. He said that the critical report on SCRs led by Professor Trisha Greenhalgh justified this, as it showed that SCRs are "positively unsafe".

"Hopefully we can now start constructive discussions as to how to rebuild the English SCR along the lines of the much more successful systems in Scotland and Wales," he added.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Comments are now closed for this entry.
  • This symbol indicates that that person is Smart Healthcare's staffStaff
  • PatientFromHell

    11 Aug 2010, 1:06PM

    From one patient's point of view, Paul Cundy's action in adding codes to his patients' records, without informing them, is outrageous. Trisha Greenhalgh may claim, as a result of a survey of relatively few doctors in the pilot stage of the SCR, that the SCR is dangerous. Another survey, covering many more patients, has shown that the use of SCRs by Out-of-hours services have increased patient safety. Take your pick, but don't arbtrarily alter records just to bolster a prejudice.

Comments are now closed for this entry.

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

  • Smart Healthcare email
  • Smart Healthcare Live 2011